Approved by Extension Governing Board 9/22/08

It is Extension's position that it should be neutral in litigation among its clientele and therefore, Extension personnel should not serve as expert witnesses in Nevada. Additionally, providing expert witness service in Nevada is a conflict of interest for Extension employees (see Extension's Conflict of Interest Policy). If an Extension employee is contacted by an attorney and asked to be an expert witness in Nevada, the individual should respond by saying, "Extension policy states that employees cannot serve as expert witnesses."

For out-of-state expert witness service that does not impact Nevadans, the employee may testify on personal time by taking annual leave and with approval of the employee's supervisor and the Director of Extension (following Extension's Conflict of Interest Policy).

When a valid subpoena is served, compliance is required. If an employee receives, either through mail or personal service, a subpoena, summons, lawsuit, or other legal document related to their employment, they should follow the procedure outlined in University Administrative Manual, Section 37 and also notify their supervisor, Area Director and the Director of Extension. The preferred method of transmitting documents is by hand delivery or by fax. If necessary, the employee may scan the documents and send as an email attachment. However, the employee should refrain from discussing the details of the case in the body of the email. This is better handled by phone call. Email documents are considered part of the permanent record and are subject to release.

In some cases, an employee may be contacted by an attorney either by phone or by email. As soon as the employee becomes aware that the request relates to a legal matter, they should refer the individual to the University's Office of the General Counsel. The employee may answer basic questions or provide printed materials that are available to the public.

When giving testimony, the employee is advised to refrain from engaging in speculation or stating personal opinions.

Extension 2008, Extension Expert Witness Policy, Extension
 

Also of Interest:

 
Water Quality Trading: A Tool to Strengthen NPS Pollution Control Water Issues Education Series – No.4
This fact sheet contains information on water quality trading by looking at what it is and the potential of water quality trading.
Singletary, L. 2005, Extension | University of Nevada, Reno, FS-05-22
Water Quality Issues on the Middle & Upper Carson River.
This special publication contains information on the basics of water quality to help understand issues on the middle and upper Carson River. Learn more about water quality stands, potential problems, restoration plans, and many more.
Cobourn, J. and S. Swanson. 2004, University of Nevada Cooperative Extension Special Publication SP-04-22, 6p.
Long-term aquatic habitat restoration: Mahogany Creek, Nevada, as a Case Study
We compared the recovery from abusive grazing of aquatic habitat due to different range management on two geomorphically similar rangeland streams in northwest Nevada...
Myers, T. J. and S. Swanson. 1996, Water Resources Bull., 32(2):241-252.
Stream Morphologic Impact of Recovery from Major Flooding in North-Central Nevada
Major floods caused channel changes ranging from complete cross sectional change to small fluctuation in pool area. We used cross-section data on 30 heavily grazed rangeland streams in North Central Nevada to assess changes over a climatically variable 14-year period...
Myers, T. J. and S. Swanson. 1996, Physical Geography, 17(5):431-445.
Temporal and Geomorphic Variations of Stream Stability and Morphology: Mahogany Creek, Nevada.
Detailed studies of long-term management impacts on rangeland streams are few because of the cost of obtaining detailed data replicated in time. This study uses government agency aquatic habitat, stream morphologic, and ocular stability data to assess land management impacts over...
Myers, T. J. and S. Swanson. 1996, Water Resources Bull., 32(2):253-265.