Does montane meadow restoration influence the mineral association and stability of soil carbon?
Abstract
Soil carbon (C) stability is an important consideration for management that aims to increase long-term C storage. The fraction of soil C allocated to physico-chemically protected mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) is a common soil C stability benchmark. However, the reality of soil C persistence is more complex than MAOM content alone—particularly in ecosystems such as meadows with high rates of belowground C inputs that can stimulate MAOM decomposition. Here, we combined three metrics of soil C persistence to characterize soil C stability across a meadow restoration chronosequence averaging belowground C gains of 330 g C m−2 y−1 for ~20 y. The metrics were: (1) the fraction of soil C in MAOM and particulate organic matter (POM), (2) the susceptibility of soil C to decomposition under varying temperatures, and (3) the utilization of MAOM-C by microbes. Two metrics suggested soil C stability may increase following montane meadow restoration. As soil C concentration increased with restoration, C storage in MAOM, but not POM, increased (metric 1). The susceptibility of MAOM-C to decomposition (microbial respiration relative to MAOM-C) decreased with increasing soil C concentration across temperatures (metric 2). Stable isotope results could not definitively determine the source of carbon dioxide efflux (metric 3) but generate hypotheses for future research to address. We posit that C sequestered following montane meadow restoration could be stable, with implications for regional C storage objectives. Further, our data point toward complex mineral-associated C dynamics including the potential importance of plant inputs for MAOM formation in meadow soils.
Bagcilar, S.H., Reed, C.C., Poulson, S.R. et al.
2024,
Does montane meadow restoration influence the mineral association and stability of soil carbon?,
Biogeochemistry 167, 1089–1105 (2024)
Extension Associated Contacts
Does montane meadow restoration influence the mineral association and stability of soil carbon?
Abstract
Soil carbon (C) stability is an important consideration for management that aims to increase long-term C storage. The fraction of soil C allocated to physico-chemically protected mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) is a common soil C stability benchmark. However, the reality of soil C persistence is more complex than MAOM content alone—particularly in ecosystems such as meadows with high rates of belowground C inputs that can stimulate MAOM decomposition. Here, we combined three metrics of soil C persistence to characterize soil C stability across a meadow restoration chronosequence averaging belowground C gains of 330 g C m−2 y−1 for ~20 y. The metrics were: (1) the fraction of soil C in MAOM and particulate organic matter (POM), (2) the susceptibility of soil C to decomposition under varying temperatures, and (3) the utilization of MAOM-C by microbes. Two metrics suggested soil C stability may increase following montane meadow restoration. As soil C concentration increased with restoration, C storage in MAOM, but not POM, increased (metric 1). The susceptibility of MAOM-C to decomposition (microbial respiration relative to MAOM-C) decreased with increasing soil C concentration across temperatures (metric 2). Stable isotope results could not definitively determine the source of carbon dioxide efflux (metric 3) but generate hypotheses for future research to address. We posit that C sequestered following montane meadow restoration could be stable, with implications for regional C storage objectives. Further, our data point toward complex mineral-associated C dynamics including the potential importance of plant inputs for MAOM formation in meadow soils.
Published by:
Bagcilar, S.H., Reed, C.C., Poulson, S.R. et al., 2024, Does montane meadow restoration influence the mineral association and stability of soil carbon?, Biogeochemistry 167, 1089–1105 (2024)
An EEO/AA Institution. Copyright ©
2024, University of Nevada Cooperative Extension.
A partnership of Nevada counties; University of Nevada, Reno; and the U.S. Department of Agriculture