Blum, M., M. S. Gustin, S. Swanson, and S. G. Donaldson 2003, Mercury in Water and Sediment of Steamboat Creek, Nevada: Implications for Stream Restoration., J. Am. Water Res. Assoc., 37(4):795-804.

In the late 1800s, mills in the Washoe Lake area, Nevada, used elemental mercury to remove gold and silver from the ores of the Comstock deposit. Since that time, mercury-contaminated waste has been distributed from Washoe Lake, down Steamboat Creek, and to the Truckee River. The creek has high mercury concentrations in both water and sediments, and continues to be a constant source of mercury to the Truckee River. The objective of this study was to determine concentrations of total and methyl mercury (MeHg) in surface sediments and characterize their spatial distribution in the Steamboat Creek watershed. Total mercury concentrations measured in channel and bank sediments did not decrease downstream, indicating that mercury contamination has been distributed along the creek’s length. Total mercury concentrations in sediments (0.01–21.43 mg/g) were one to two orders of magnitude higher than those in pristine systems. At 14 out of 17 sites, MeHg concentrations in streambank sediments were higher than the concentrations in the channel, suggesting that low banks with wet sediments might be important sites of mercury methylation in this system. Both pond wetland and channel sites exhibited high potential for mercury methylation (6.4–30.0 ng g-1 day-1). Potential methylation rates were positively correlated with sulfate reduction rates, and decreased as a function of reduced sulfur and MeHg concentration in the sediments. Potential demethylation rate appeared not to be influenced by MeHg concentration, sulfur chemistry, DOC, sediment grain size or other parameters, and showed little variation across the sites (3.7–7.4 ng g-1 day-1).

Authors of this scholarly work are no longer available.

Please contact Extension's Communication Team for assistance.

 

Also of Interest:

 
Estrus Synchronization Recommendations for Artificial Insemination of Beef Cows JM Thomas, RC Bonacker, CM Andersen, EG Smith, G Vanwye 2021, University of Missouri, Extension
Douglas County Cow-Calf Production Costs & Returns
This publication is intended to be a guide used to make production decisions, determine potential returns, and prepare business and marketing plans. Practices described are based on the production practices considered typical for a beef cattle cow-calf operation in this region, b...
Curtis, K., Lewis, S., and Ruby, K. 2006, Extension | University of Nevada, Reno, FS-07-11
Elko County Cow-Calf Production Costs & Returns
The practices described are not the recommendations of the University of Nevada, Reno, but rather production practices and materials considered typical of a well-managed beef cattle operation in the region, as determined by a producer panel conducted in October 2006.
Curtis, K., Brough, E., Torell, R., and Riggs, W. 2006, Extension | University of Nevada, Reno, FS-07-08
Lyon County Cow-Calf Production Costs & Returns
This publication is intended to be a guide used to make production decisions, determine potential returns, and prepare business and marketing plans. Practices described are based on the production practices considered typical for a beef cattle cow-calf operation in this region, b...
Beaupre, A., Curtis, K., and Singletary, L. 2006, Extension | University of Nevada, Reno, FS-07-13
Pershing County Cow-Calf Production Costs & Returns
This publication is intended to be a guide used to make production decisions, determine potential returns, and prepare business and marketing plans. Practices described are based on the production practices considered typical for a beef cattle cow-calf operation in this region, b...
Breazeale, D., Curtis, K., and Vesco, A. 2006, Extension | University of Nevada, Reno, FS-07-12